During two separate periods of rapid inflation, the
Massachusetts Bay Colony put in practice a tabular standard in which debts
payable in shillings were adjusted for changes in the purchasing power of the
paper currency. Under the tabular standard, a 100 percent rise in the price
level meant debtors owed twice as many shillings as they had borrowed. Without
the protection of a tabular standard, the money that came back to creditors in
repayment for loans had less purchasing power than the money they first loaned
out.
The first experiment with a tabular standard occurred in 1742, when the
legislature authorized a new issue of paper currency. At the same time the
legislature enacted a so-called equity law, requiring the repayment of all debts
of five years duration and contracted after March 1742 at a rate of 6 2/3 paper
shillings to an ounce of silver. The most innovative portion of the law,
however, empowered justices of the Massachusetts courts, in adjudicating
disputes involving debts paid in paper currency, to “make Amends for the
depreciating of said Bills from their present stated Value,” which was 6 2/3
shillings to an ounce of silver. That is, the justices could force debtors to
pay more than 6 2/3 shillings to an ounce of silver to compensate creditors for
the erosion in purchasing power of their money while it was loaned out.
(Creditors often do not fully anticipate inflation and do not charge enough
interest to compensate for inflation.) Every six months the purchasing power of
the new bills was adjusted according to “the Rates that said Bills then commonly
pass at in Proportion to Silver and Bills of Exchange payable in London.”
Debtors complained that the equity law only considered the exchange ratio
between paper shillings and silver, which might only reflect speculative
activity, and ignored the cost of living in paper shillings, which was more
pertinent to their lives. In 1747 the legislature amended the equity law to
provide that “when any valuation shall be made of the bills … in pursuance of
said act [1742] … regard shall be had not only to silver and bills of exchange,
but to the prices of provisions and other necessaries of life” (Lester, 1939).
This law did not remove all disagreement about the rate of depreciation of the
bills, but it diffused the issue until 1749 when Massachusetts received from
England a large reimbursement for war expenditures and began redeeming its paper
money.
The colonial legislature faced similar problems during the American
Revolution when Massachusetts soldiers complained that their pay, set at the
time of enlistment, had lost all but a tiny fraction of its purchasing power. To
encourage reenlistment, the legislature computed the original pay in terms of
what it would buy in Indian corn, beef, sheep wool, and sole leather, and
compensated the soldiers accordingly for the balance owed them in four bond
issues, bearing 6 percent interest. The bond issues matured in 1781, 1782, 1783,
and 1784, successively.
Soldiers refusing to enlist received similar bonds maturing in
1785, 1786, 1787, and 1788. The legislature indexed the principal and interest
on these bonds to the prices of four staple commodities. A statement on the face
of these bonds read:
both principal and interest to be paid in the then current money of said state [Massachusetts], in a greater or less sum, according as five bushels of corn, sixty-eight pounds and four-sevenths parts of a pound of beef, ten pounds of sole leather shall then cost, more or less, than one hundred and thirty pounds current money, at the then current prices of the said articles.(Lester, 1939)
The advent of fiat paper currency opened the possibility of episodes of rapid
inflation that was unheard-of in monetary systems based upon precious metal
standards, such as gold and silver. Rapid bouts of inflation wiped out the
claims of creditors against debtors, setting the creditors against the debtors,
and making the hidden seam separating debtors and creditors a major point of
social division and political discontent. Massachusetts Bay Colony demonstrated
Yankee ingenuity in developing a scheme for balancing the interest of creditors
and debtors at a time when inflationary finance was inevitable.
See also:
References:
Fisher, W. C. 1913. The Tabular Standard in Massachusetts History.
Quarterly Journal of Economics, 27 (May): 417–454.
Lester, Richard A. 1939. Monetary Experiments.