The velocity of money is the average number of times per year
that a unit of currency (e.g., U.S. dollar, Japanese yen, German mark, etc.) is
spent on goods and services. From a theoretical perspective a percentage change
in the velocity of money can have the same impact on prices or other economic
variables as an equivalent percentage change in the money supply.
Sir William Petty (1623–1687) may have been the first writer on economics to
describe the velocity of money. He advanced the plausible view that the velocity
of money was determined by the frequency of people’s pay periods. The famous
philosopher John Locke (1632–1704) wrote on monetary economics and referred to
the ratio of a country’s money stock to its trade, a concept bearing a marked
resemblance to velocity. By the mid-twentieth century, the concept of velocity
was a cornerstone of monetary economics, which is the study of the relationship
between the money supply and prices, interest rates, and output.
A measure of velocity can be calculated by dividing a measure of a nation’s
output (i.e., Gross Domestic Product or GDP) by a measure of the money supply.
Between 1945 and 1981 one measure of velocity varied between two and seven.
Whether velocity is stable or fluctuates in a narrow range, conditional upon
stability in other parts of the economy, remains one of the important
theoretical questions in monetary economics.
Under conditions of hyperinflation money loses its value quickly and people
try to spend it faster. During the classic case of the German hyperinflation
after World War I workers were paid at half-day intervals, and took off work to
spend their wages before they lost their value. These are the conditions that
set velocity soaring, further feeding the inflationary momentum that begins with
excess money supplies.
A depression economy, particularly when coupled with falling prices, may lead
households and businesses to hoard money because they are afraid that stocks and
bonds are unsafe investments and perhaps because they hope to capture the
benefits of falling prices. These conditions produce declining velocity, having
the same effect as declining money supplies, sending the economy into a steeper
descent.
Many modern economists argue that if the government stabilizes the money
supply growth rate at a modest rate, perhaps 3 to 5 percent annually, velocity
will also stabilize, and the growth path of the economy will mirror the
stability in the monetary growth rate.
See also
References:
McCallum, Bennett T. 1989. Monetary Economics.
Sargent, Thomas. 1993. Rational Expectations and Inflation.
2d ed.